Oil companies want to build pipelines to carry oil from
refineries to seaports for transport overseas. Environmentalists say these
pipelines are dangerous for the environment and should not be built.
Discuss both these positions and give your own
opinion.
One question that is causing discussion
recently between the environmentalists and the oil companies has been the
pipelines that these oil companies are aiming to construct in order to transport
oil from refineries to seaports to be exported afterward, which they claim to
be threatening to the environment.
The oil companies defend these constructions
arguing that pipelines are the safest and most efficient way to transport oil
and gas, being also competitive to the export market. Thus, it would not be
possible to supply the whole world´s demand for fuel by using only rail or
road. Another arguments are that the project is part of the economic growth of
the country and having the infrastructure built will also help with emissions
reductions, because there will be less trucks on the roads.
On the other hand, there are
strong arguments from the environmentalists. Firstly, it has been proven that
these pipelines frequently have leaks, consequently polluting rivers, killing
plants and wildlife that harms the ecosystem. Moreover, if the land is
disrupted it will not be the same even for 100 years and if there is a leak on
this land it will take thousands of years until this land is productive again.
The consequence would be having a whole town without proper water and with an
area of unproductive land.
My conclusion is, although there
are reasonable grounds to build the pipelines, the risks involved when is being
transported if leaks are too high and outweigh the benefits of speed and cost,
becoming unfeasible.